Developing a Cryptocurrency Assessment Framework: Function over Form
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2018.121Keywords:
Classification, Altcoins, Ethereum, TokensAbstract
The rise of cryptocurrency as a new sui generis asset class creates a need for a new classification scheme to cover the wide range of functionality for which tokens can be used. By differentiating tokens based on their functional attributes, cryptocurrency tokens can be categorised into crypto-transaction tokens (which act as a cash substitute); crypto-fuel tokens (which underpin generic blockchain applications); and crypto-voucher tokens (which can be exchanged for a predefined asset). This classification is applied to identify important issues when considering whether to participate in a cryptocurrency system, such as the impact of potential forks, token supply expectations and the level of dependence on a few operators (entity-dependence). For crypto-transaction tokens (and crypto-fuel tokens if used in a similar or overlapping role) it shows the importance of the token being seen as a “better” form of money. For crypto-fuel tokens, the popularity of blockchain applications and the utility of the crypto-fuel system in application development is vital. For crypto-voucher tokens, the value of the underlying asset, the token’s exchangeability for that asset and the importance of a digital representation should be considered by participants. The interplay between fundamentals and speculation as drivers of price is considered.
An erratum to this article has been published at as DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2018.151.
References
AirSwap Team. “Swap: A Peer-to-Peer Protocol for Trading Ethereum Tokens.” No Publisher (2017) https://swap.tech/whitepaper/.
AirSwap Team. “The AirSwap Token.” AirSwap Blog (accessed 18 December 2017) https://blog.airswap.io/the-airswap-token-42855fe5e120.
Bennington, A. “Utility Coins or Crypto Assets? Token Terminology Is One Big Gray Area.” CoinDesk (accessed 7 November 2017) https://www.coindesk.com/utility-coins-crypto-assets-token-terminology-one-big-gray-area/.
Ben-Sasson, E. et al. “Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin (extended version).” No Publisher (18 May 2014) http://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf.
Bercetche, J. “ICO or initial coin offerings are an ‘absolute scam’: Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales.”
CNBC (accessed 7 November 2017) https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/05/ico-or-initial-coin-offerings-are-an-absolute-scam-wikipedias-jimmy-wales.html.
Bitcoin Cash. “Bitcoin Cash - Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash.” Bitcoin Cash - Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash (accessed 5 October 2017) https://www.bitcoincash.org/.
Bitcoin Gold. “Bitcoin Gold - GPU Bitcoin Mining (Official Website).” Bitcoin Gold (accessed 18 December 2017) https://bitcoingold.org/.
Bitcoin Wiki. “Weaknesses.” Bitcoin Wiki (accessed 19 October 2017) https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses#Attacker_has_a_lot_of_computing_power.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. “FAQs: How does the Federal Reserve Board determine how much currency to order each year?” The Fed (accessed 8 December 2017) https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/how-does-the-federal-reserve-board-determine-how-much-currency-to-order-each-year.htm.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. “FAQs: How much does it cost to produce currency and coin?” The Fed (accessed 8 December 2017) https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12771.htm.
Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R. “What Does Bitcoin Look Like?” Annals of Economics & Finance. 16.2 449–492 (2015) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283676718_What_Does_Bitcoin_Look_Like.
Bowe, S., Hornby, T., Wilcox, N. “Zcash Protocol Specification Version 2017.0-beta-2.7.” Zerocoin Electric Coin Company (accessed 1 November 2017) https://github.com/zcash/zips/blob/master/protocol/protocol.pdf.
Buntinx, J-P. “What is MyEtherShop?” The Merkle (accessed 12 April 2018) https://themerkle.com/what-is-myethershop/.
Burnie, A., Henderson, A., Burnie, J. “Putting Names to Things: reconciling cryptocurrency heterogeneity and regulatory continuity.” Journal of International Banking and Financial Law. 33.2 83-86 (2018).
Carney, M. “The Future of Money.” Scottish Economics Conference. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University. (2018) https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/speech/2018/the-future-of-money-speech-by-mark-carney.pdf?la=en&hash=A51E1C8E90BDD3D071A8D6B4F8C1566E7AC91418.
Castor, A. “A Short Guide to Bitcoin Forks.” CoinDesk (accessed 9 November 2017) https://www.coindesk.com/short-guide-bitcoin-forks-explained/.
Centre for Citizenship, Enterprise and Governance. “Seratio Token Whitepaper 6.0.” Seratio Platform ICO (accessed 7 December 2017) https://www.seratio-coins.world/.
CoinCap. “CoinCap Rankings.” CoinCap.io (accessed 18 December 2017) http://coincap.io/.
CoinDesk. “What is the Difference Between Litecoin and Bitcoin?” CoinDesk. (2014) https://www.coindesk.com/information/comparing-litecoin-bitcoin/.
CoinMarketCap. “CoinMarketCap FAQ.” coinmarketcap.com (accessed 20 December 2017) https://coinmarketcap.com/faq/.
CoinMarketCap. “Cryptocurrency Market Capitalizations.” coinmarketcap.com (accessed 18 December 2017) https://coinmarketcap.com/.
Cornish, C., Kaminska, I., Stafford, P., Murphy, H., Samson, A. “Chaotic trading marks new surge in bitcoin price.” Financial Times (2017) https://www.ft.com/content/3136ca5e-db78-11e7-a039-c64b1c09b482.
crypto-oracle. “TOP 5 – PRIVACY CRYPTOCURRENCIES - FUTURE OF CRYPTO SECURITY.” Steemit (accessed 6 December 2017) https://steemit.com/crypto/@crypto-oracle/top-5-privacy-cryptocurrencies.
Dai, P., Mahi, N., Earls, J., Norta, A. “Smart-Contract Value-Transfer Protocols on a Distributed Mobile Application Platform.” No Publisher (accessed 3 November 2017) https://qtum.org/uploads/files/a2772efe4dc8ed1100319c6480195fb1.pdf.
Damodaran, A. “Approaches to Valuation.” in Investment valuation: tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. 11–25 Hoboken: Wiley (2012).
Demers, E., Lev, B. “A rude awakening: Internet shakeout in 2000.” Review of Accounting Studies. 6.2 331–359 (2001).
DeRose, C. “Cryptocurrency Investment Cues From the South Sea Bubble.” CoinDesk (accessed 7 December 2017) https://www.coindesk.com/cryptocurrency-investment-cues-south-seas-bubble/.
Donaire, A. R. “Why NEM is Your Production Level Blockchain Platform.” NEM (accessed 12 October 2017) https://blog.nem.io/production-level-blockchain/.
Duffield, E., Diaz, D. “Dash: A PrivacyCentric CryptoCurrency.” No Publisher (2015) https://www.dash.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf.
EOS.IO. “EOS.IO Technical White Paper.” EOS.IO (accessed 18 December 2017) https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation.
Ethereum Classic. “Ethereum Classic.” Ethereum Classic (accessed 16 October 2017) https://ethereumclassic.github.io/.
Ethereum. “White Paper” Ethereum (2017) https://github.com/ethereum/wiki.
European Parliament and the Council. “Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU.” (2014) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014L0065.
Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Currency Processing and Destruction.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York (accessed 24 November 2017) https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed11.html.
Field, M., Titcomb, J. “Bitcoin bubble balloons to $11,000 – and even Katy Perry’s on board now.” The Telegraph (29 November 2017) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/11/29/bitcoin-jumps-11000-less-12-hours-10000-breakthrough/.
Financial Conduct Authority. “Distributed Ledger Technology: Feedback Statement on Discussion Paper 17/03.” Financial Conduct Authority (accessed 30 December 2017) https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/feedback/fs17-04.pdf.
Financial Conduct Authority. “Initial Coin Offerings.” FCA (accessed 4 October 2017) https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/initial-coin-offerings.
Herbert, J. & Stabauer, M. “Bitcoin & co: An ontology for categorising cryptocurrencies.” in 2015 M-SPHERE: Book of Papers. 45–55 Zagreb: Accent (2016) https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeff_Herbert/publication/291824954_Bitcoin_Co_An_Ontology_For_Categorising_Cryptocurrencies/links/56a6695708ae6c437c1aedfa/Bitcoin-Co-An-Ontology-For-Categorising-Cryptocurrencies.pdf.
Hertzog, E., Benartzi, G. “Bancor Protocol: Decentralized networks for smart contract based tokens to enable continuous convertibility between them.” No Publisher (accessed 26 October 2017) https://www.bancor.network/static/bancor_protocol_whitepaper_en.pdf.
Higgins, S. “CFTC Aligns With SEC: ICO Tokens Can Be Commodities.” CoinDesk (accessed 7 November 2017) https://www.coindesk.com/cftc-no-inconsistency-sec-cryptocurrency-regulation/.
Hileman, D. G., Rauchs, M. “2017 Global Cryptocurrency Benchmarking Study.” Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge Judge Business School (2017) https://ssrn.com/abstract=2965436.
Hileman, G. “Alternative Currencies: A Historical Survey and Taxonomy.” Working Paper (Available at SSRN). (2013) https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2747975."
Hileman, G., Rauchs, M. “2017 Global Blockchain Benchmarking Study.” Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, University of Cambridge Judge Business School (2017) https://ssrn.com/abstract=3040224.
Hoskinson, C. “Why we are building Cardano.” IOHK (accessed 18 December 2017) https://whycardano.com/.
Imbert, F. “JPMorgan’s Dimon: Bitcoin is a fraud that will eventually blow up.” CNBC (accessed 7 November 2017) https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/12/jpmorgan-ceo-jamie-dimon-raises-flag-on-trading-revenue-sees-20-percent-fall-for-the-third-quarter.html.
Irrera, A., Stecklow, S. “Tezos organizers hit with second lawsuit over cryptocurrency fundraiser.” Reuters (accessed 20 November 2017) https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-tezos/tezos-organizers-hit-with-second-lawsuit-over-cryptocurrency-fundraiser-idUKKBN1DF37L.
Irrera, A., Stecklow, S. “Tezos organizers sued in California over crypto currency project.” Reuters (accessed 18 December 2017) https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-tezos-battles/tezos-organizers-sued-in-california-over-crypto-currency-project-idUKKBN1D325.
Kik Interactive, Inc. “Kin: a decentralized ecosystem of digital services for daily life.” Kik Interactive, Inc. (accessed 18 December 2017) http://www.kinecosystem.org/static/files/Kin_Whitepaper_V1_English.pdf.
Kristoufek, L. “BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era.” Scientific Reports. 3.3415 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03415.
Monero. “The Merits of Monero: Why Monero vs Bitcoin.” Monero.How - Monero tutorials, statistics, charts and resources (accessed 12 October 2017) https://www.monero.how/why-monero-vs-bitcoin.
Monetary Authority of Singapore. “A Guide to Digital Token Offerings.” Monetary Authority of Singapore (accessed 30 December 2017) http://www.mas.gov.sg/News-and-Publications/Monographs-and-Information-Papers/2017/Guidance-on-Digital-Token-Offerings.aspx.
Mullaney, T. “A tale of two bubbles — the dot-coms and bitcoin.” MarketWatch. (7 December 2017) http://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-tale-of-two-bubbles-the-dot-coms-and-bitcoin-2017-12-07.
Nakamoto, S. “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” No Publisher (2008) https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
Noether, S., Mackenzie, A., Monero Research Lab. “Ring Confidential Transactions.” Ledger. 1 1–18 (2016) https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2016.34.
Omni Team. “Omni Layer: An open-source, fully-decentralized asset platform on the Bitcoin Blokchain.” Omni Layer (2017) http://www.omnilayer.org/.
Onchain Finance. “Cryptoasset rankings and metrics for investors.” Cryptoasset network value, market cap, rankings & metrics (accessed 18 December 2017) https://onchainfx.com/.
Onchain Finance. “Cryptoasset rankings and metrics for investors.” Cryptoasset network value, market cap, rankings & metrics (accessed 30 October 2017) https://onchainfx.com/.
Partington, R. “Bitcoin: is it a bubble waiting to burst or a good investment?” The Guardian (2 December 2017) http://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/dec/02/bitcoin-is-it-a-bubble-waiting-to-burst-or-a-good-investment.
Pogson, G. Insight report on distributed ledger technologies. London: Lloyd’s Register Foundation and The Alan Turing Institute (2017) http://www.lrfoundation.org.uk/publications/download-insight-report-on-distributed-ledger-technologies.aspx.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. “Making sense of bitcoin, cryptocurrency, and blockchain.” PwC (2018) https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/fintech/bitcoin-blockchain-cryptocurrency.html.
Protocol Labs. “Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network.” Protocol Labs (2017) https://filecoin.io/filecoin.pdf
Qtum Foundation. “Qtum Blockchain Economy Whitepaper.” Qtum Foundation (2017) https://qtum.org/uploads/files/ef2723f33deef1875ef17361f7c696ef.pdf.
QUOINE Pte. Ltd. “Whitepaper version 1.9: Providing liquidity to the non-LIQUID Crypto Economy.” QUOINE Pte. Ltd. (2017) https://liquid.plus/.
Reijers, W., O’Brolcháin, F., Haynes, P. “Governance in Blockchain Technologies & Social Contract Theories.” Ledger. 1 134–151 (2016) https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2016.62.
Reutzel, B. “Logical or Not, Bitcoin’s Coming Fork Is Boosting Its Price.” CoinDesk (accessed 9 November 2017) https://www.coindesk.com/logical-not-bitcoins-coming-fork-boosting-price/.
Ripple. “Ripple - One Frictionless Experience To Send Money Globally.” Ripple - One Frictionless Experience To Send Money Globally (accessed 9 October 2017) https://ripple.com/.
Ripple. “XRP The Digital Asset for Payments.” Ripple - One Frictionless Experience To Send Money Globally (accessed 9 October 2017) https://ripple.com/xrp/.
Russell, J. “First China, now South Korea has banned ICOs.” TechCrunch (28 September 2017) https://techcrunch.com/2017/09/28/south-korea-has-banned-icos/.
Shiller, R. “Diverse views on asset bubbles.” In W. C. Hunter, G. G. Kaufman & M. Pomerleano (Ed.), Asset Price Bubbles: The Implications for Monetary, Regulatory and International Policies. Cambridge: MIT Press (2003) 35–39.
Silverman, G., Murphy, H., Authers, J. “The dangers of a digital gold rush.” FT Weekend (2-3 December 2017).
Smith + Crown. “ICOs and Crowdsales.” Cryptofinancial News, Research & Analysis. (2017) https://www.smithandcrown.com/icos/.
Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). “FINMA publishes ICO guidelines.” FINMA (accessed 8 March 2018) https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2018/02/20180216-mm-ico-wegleitung/.
Tether Ltd. “Tether: Fiat currencies on the Bitcoin blockchain.” Tether Ltd. (June 2016) https://tether.to/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TetherWhitePaper.pdf.
The Neo Project. “NEO White Paper.” The Neo Project (accessed 16 October 2017) https://github.com/neo-project/docs.
thegrinder. “The BitConnect scam exposed.” Steemit (accessed 1 November 2017) https://steemit.com/scam/@thegrinder/the-bitconnect-scam-exposed.
Torpey, K. “Comparing Digital Currencies? Market Cap Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story.”
Bitcoin Magazine. (22 December 2016) https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/comparing-digital-currencies-market-cap-doesn-t-tell-the-whole-story-1482418052/.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. “Investor Bulletin: Initial Coin Offerings.” SEC.gov (accessed 4 October 2017) https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ib_coinofferings.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO (accessed 7 November 2017) https://www.sec.gov/litigation/investreport/34-81207.pdf.
Wickham, H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer (2009) http://ggplot2.org.
Wilke, C. cowplot: Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for ‘ggplot2’. (2017) https://github.com/wilkelab/cowplot.
Woo, W. “The network effects of volatility and liquidity, Bitcoin vs other payment coins.” Woobull (12 December 2016) http://woobull.com/the-network-effects-of-volatility-and-liquidity-bitcoin-vs-other-payment-coins/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
